Ground a claim against the primary literature.

A live research workspace: paste a claim, watch the agent search PubMed, ground each part to a verbatim source, and flag what it can't support. No signup, no mocks.

/ try · live

Paste a claim. Get verified citations, or honest red flags.

The agent decomposes your paragraph into atomic claims, searches PubMed for each, and locates a verbatim supporting passage. An independent verifier scores every quote. Claims it can’t support are marked unsupported, not hidden.

~60–90s · live PubMed retrieval, not a recording
Every quote links to its source, labelled full text or abstract
“Unsupported” is a real outcome. We never force a citation

Searches PubMed live · a few free runs per day

Or try a sample

The rest of the workspace

Cover the literature, from first question to submission.

Each tool runs the same retrieval and verification pipeline as the grounder above: agentic PubMed search, primary-trial ranking, and quote verification. They cover the literature-facing steps of a paper, not study design or analysis. Pick the step you’re on.

Step 1 · before you commit

What’s been tested, and where’s the gap?

Use this before you sink months into a project, to see what’s already been tested and what remains open.

Novelty Checker

Has this been done? Where is the gap?

The agent reframes your hypothesis into several search angles, retrieves PubMed evidence, and sorts primary studies into TESTED versus ADJACENT, with a plain-English read on the open gap. Coverage is PubMed-indexed work only: preprints, conference abstracts, and in-press papers aren’t included.

Hypothesis reformulationPrimary-vs-review sortingGap synthesis

Step 2 · while you write

Draft the related work, and ground every claim.

Use these while writing: turn seeds into a cited section, and check any paragraph of your own draft against the literature.

Paragraph Citation Grounder

Already at the top of the page. Paste a paragraph and get verified citations, or red-flagged unsupported claims.

↑ Start here

Step 3 · before you submit

Pre-submission gut check.

Use these before you hit submit: surface the critiques a reviewer is likely to raise, and the evidence that disagrees with your claim.

Reviewer #2 Simulator

The methodological concerns a reviewer will raise, grounded in comparable papers.

Paste a Methods or Results paragraph. The agent finds peer studies with comparable methods and raises the concerns the text you paste doesn’t address, each anchored to how a comparable paper handled (or failed) the same issue.

Peer-method matchingUndisclosed-bias critique

Counter-Evidence Finder

Find the published evidence that disagrees with your claim.

The agent runs adversarial searches for null results, failed replications, and contradictory evidence, then returns the strongest counter-papers with stance-checked verbatim quotes, plus limitations to address before you submit.

Adversarial searchStance-checked contradictions